Skip to main content alibris logo

The Right Assumed by the Judges to Fine a Defendant While Making His Defence in Person, Denied: Being a Shorthand Report of the Important Legal Argument of Henry Cooper, Esq. Barrister at Law, in the King V. Davison; On Moving for a New Trial

by

Write The First Customer Review
The Right Assumed by the Judges to Fine a Defendant While Making His Defence in Person, Denied: Being a Shorthand Report of the Important Legal Argument of Henry Cooper, Esq. Barrister at Law, in the King V. Davison; On Moving for a New Trial - Cooper, Henry
Filter Results
Shipping
Item Condition
Seller Rating
Other Options
Change Currency
Browse related Subjects
+ Browse All Subjects

Full Title: "The Right Assumed by the Judges to Fine a Defendant While Making His Defence in Person, Denied: Being a Shorthand Report of the Important Legal Argument of Henry Cooper, Esq. Barrister at Law, in the King v. Davison; on Moving for a New Trial"Description: "The Making of the Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs and arguments and more. Readers can delve into ...

loading
The Right Assumed by the Judges to Fine a Defendant While Making His Defence in Person, Denied: Being a Shorthand Report of the Important Legal Argument of Henry Cooper, Esq. Barrister at Law, in the King V. Davison; On Moving for a New Trial 2012, Gale Ecco, Making of Modern Law, Charleston SC

ISBN-13: 9781275106314

Trade paperback