This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1908 Excerpt: ...River between New York and New Jersey. See Lincks v. Amend, 32 Atl. 755 (Ct. Ch. N. J., 1895); People v. Kelly, 76 N. Y. 475 necting points in different States.83 It follows that the obstruction to navigation caused by a bridge thus authorized ' must be deemed to be a burden lawfully imposed upon the free navigation of ...
Read More
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1908 Excerpt: ...River between New York and New Jersey. See Lincks v. Amend, 32 Atl. 755 (Ct. Ch. N. J., 1895); People v. Kelly, 76 N. Y. 475 necting points in different States.83 It follows that the obstruction to navigation caused by a bridge thus authorized ' must be deemed to be a burden lawfully imposed upon the free navigation of the river, of which no one can legally complain."84 (1879). So of an act conferring power upon a State corporation to construct a bridge across Staten Island Sound between New York and New Jersey, though such construction had been expressly prohibited by one of such States (New Jersey). Decker v. Baltimore & N. Y. Ry. Co., 30 Fed. 723 (C. C. N. Y., 1887); Pennsylvania Ry. Co. v. Baltimore & N. Y. Ry. Co., 37 Fed. 129 (C. C. N. Y., 1888. See as to burden of proof of compliance with conditions of grant of authority). See Stockton v. Baltimore & N. Y. R. R. Co., 32 Fed. 9 (C. C. N.J., 1887); State v. Boiler, 47 Fed. 415 (C. C. N. J., 1889), involving same subject-matter. Seo generally Commissioners of Parks, etc., of Detroit v. Common Council of Detroit, 80 Mich. 663, 45 N. W. 508 (1890). As to acts allowing erection of bridges across Mississippi river, see Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R. Co., 33 Iowa, 422, 499 (1872). By act of March 23, 1906 (34 Stat. L. 84), is regulated the construction of bridges under authority of Congress. 83 See Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Mason City, etc., R. R. Co., 199 U. S. 160, 26 Supm. 19, 50 L. ed. 134 (1905). 84 U. S. v. Keokuk & H. Bridge Co., 45 Fed. 178 (D. C. Iowa, 1891). As to relief against obstruction caused by bridge constructed under authority of Congress, see U. S. v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. R. Co., 26 Fed. 113 (D. C. Pa., 1886); St. Louis & St. Paul Packet Co. v. Ke...
Read Less
Add this copy of The Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. to cart. $23.89, new condition, Sold by Ingram Customer Returns Center rated 5.0 out of 5 stars, ships from NV, USA, published 2010 by Gale, Making of Modern Law.
Add this copy of The Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution to cart. $39.29, new condition, Sold by Paperbackshop rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Bensenville, IL, UNITED STATES, published 2010 by Gale Ecco, Making of Modern Law.
Add this copy of The Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. to cart. $47.54, new condition, Sold by Booksplease rated 3.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Southport, MERSEYSIDE, UNITED KINGDOM, published 2010 by Gale Ecco, Making of Modern Law.
Add this copy of The Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution to cart. $57.18, good condition, Sold by Bonita rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Newport Coast, CA, UNITED STATES, published 2010 by Gale Ecco, Making of Modern La.
