Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court Submitted by the Railway Committee of the Privy Council: Arising on an Application of the Hon. Joseph Martin, Railway Commissioner of Manitoba (Classic Reprint)
Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court Submitted by the Railway Committee of the Privy Council: Arising on an Application of the Hon. Joseph Martin, Railway Commissioner of Manitoba (Classic Reprint)
Excerpt from Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court Submitted by the Railway Committee of the Privy Council: Arising on an Application of the Hon. Joseph Martin, Railway Commissioner of Manitoba Mr. Blake - I appear, with my learned friends, Mr. Robin son and Mr. Clark, for the Canadian Pacific Railway Company in this case. As I understand the position of affairs, the Railway Commissioner Of Manitoba applied to the Railway Committee Of the Privy Council to authorize a crossing on the Canadian Pacific Railway. On ...
Read More
Excerpt from Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court Submitted by the Railway Committee of the Privy Council: Arising on an Application of the Hon. Joseph Martin, Railway Commissioner of Manitoba Mr. Blake - I appear, with my learned friends, Mr. Robin son and Mr. Clark, for the Canadian Pacific Railway Company in this case. As I understand the position of affairs, the Railway Commissioner Of Manitoba applied to the Railway Committee Of the Privy Council to authorize a crossing on the Canadian Pacific Railway. On that the Canadian Pacific Railway Com pany intervened and raised a preliminary legal objection that the Railway Commissioner had no authority to construct a line cross ing the Canadian Pacific Railway, in consequence of the illegality of the statute. That question is now submitted to you. Ritchie, C. J. - Would not that question come more logically from the party who claims the right to cross? Mr. Blake - J am quite willing that my learned friends should allege that there is no presumption in favor of the validity of the statute, if they choose. The whole question depends, as I under stand it, upon the validity of the local statute. That is the ques tion - is the local legislation valid or void? I understand the legal presumption to be prima fade in favor of the local statute. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at ... This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Read Less
Add this copy of Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court to cart. $18.79, new condition, Sold by Paperbackshop rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Bensenville, IL, UNITED STATES, published 2018 by Forgotten Books.
Add this copy of Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court to cart. $28.67, new condition, Sold by Paperbackshop rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Bensenville, IL, UNITED STATES, published 2018 by Forgotten Books.
Add this copy of Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court to cart. $41.12, good condition, Sold by Bonita rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Newport Coast, CA, UNITED STATES, published 2017 by Forgotten Books.
Add this copy of Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court to cart. $55.78, good condition, Sold by Bonita rated 4.0 out of 5 stars, ships from Newport Coast, CA, UNITED STATES, published 2018 by Forgotten Books.
All Editions of Report of an Argument Before the Supreme Court Submitted by the Railway Committee of the Privy Council: Arising on an Application of the Hon. Joseph Martin, Railway Commissioner of Manitoba (Classic Reprint)
